/ @ Bullet controversy is already discussed. http://blog.psiram.net/2014/10/die-scientabilitaet-die

Choose a blog ... Science Blogs Jump to page Everything split that lives And the water Seems inviting Astrodicticum simplex blooDNAcid Chevoja Deutsches Museum Epi goes Gender ErklärFix evolvimus flight time and breath of fresh air Geograffitico health check live here Dragon Rock from the Sun Crypto thought Klausis column Critical Mathlog sea Text naklar Open Skies Panorama placebo alarm PrimaKlima Science Blogs Podcast - Science takeaway Science meets Society SocioKommunikativ From bits and bytes weatherlog split WeiterGen Science Communication Science split feuilleton political animal [sic] - Science Communication 3vor10 Everything split that flies American encounters the other hand, Arte Fact beauty full Science Chemical seen Columbus guest blog Darwin Year The lab notebook DiAx's Rake The other educational Durchschaut E-Mobility depth sounder A bit dark For Women in Science Geo? Logical! Historians Iconic Turn guest blog your research question of future communication complete complex Critical Mass Backstage-en-Blog praise of the disease meal Medlog wit Nano youth neuron neuroscience education split Nobel Faces Meeting of Nobel Laureates persona grata school makes future split Science Picture electricity creatures Deep Life TwOpinion split VDE MedTech Science and reunification number of pictures divers future split technologies In Search ScienceBlogs.de
The title of this post says it all. Today at 00:00 clock sounded the starting shot for the nomination phase for the Golden Brett 2014th This year we have - as every year - the crème de la crème of science affine celebrities can win as presenters, namely Hoaxmistress Alexa von Hoaxilla, the dreaded by homeopaths pharmacologist Professor Michael Freissmuth and the Science Slam Abräumer Martin "the fly" Moder , In between, we also honor nor the wonderful Florian split Scheuba!
It is so exciting. Mrs. Steffens I find a worthy candidate - we had this before. But all sources split in the nominations refer to the last year - it seems now to keep covered.
My Kanditat: A Journal to esoteric topics that are skeptical but dogmatic concerns. Details here: http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~mattes/PDF/sextus_und_die_vier_dogmatiker-mit_hintergrund.pdf
Ohoho 1: mental lockstep army! Wehrmacht !!!!!!!! NAAAAZIIIII-BARBAREIIIIIIIIIIIIII split !!!!!!! AAAAaaaaaaaaaarrrghhh !!!!!!!!!!!!!! But this is also a mess: all math books in the world claim 1 + 2 is 3. Self been on the books for children. We should all Goebbels' victims! Why there are always marginalized like you who shoot with the sharpest language calibers, when they should put up to caliber mentioned just once maintained themselves? Ohoho 2: a research ban. Witches! Inquisition !! MIDDLE AGES !!!! AAAAaaaaaaaaaarrrghhh !!!!!!!!!!!!!! split
Well. or maybe just a way to work cleanly and must do everything three or four times, because with the dirty work a lot of problems in the neck, uh, hext. And the expectable problems are indeed not without: split
Weymayr formulated the concept of Scientabilität in the interview by Stephan Angene as follows: "Before you make clinical trials, one should consider whether the drug or procedure contradicts the known laws of nature. If natural laws are violated, clinical split studies have not make sense. On the contrary, it is dangerous because inevitably studies are to be expected with positive results, which are then transferred or misinterpreted. [1] "
Josef Mattes: I have not read the skeptics, but rather numerous discussions in related forums Defiant split / blogs etc. when it came to the topic of "Scientabilität". Many "skeptics" have this idea rather negative about, at least that was my impression.
/ @ Bullet controversy is already discussed. http://blog.psiram.net/2014/10/die-scientabilitaet-die-homoeopathie-und-die-wissenschaftsbasierte-medizin-1-kritik-und-kritiker/ http://blog.psiram.net/2014/10/die-scientabilitaet-die-homoeopathie-und-die-wissenschaftsbasierte-medizin-2-was-solls/ http://blog.gwup.net/2014/05/17/scientabilitat-oder-klinische-evidenz-oder-beides/ http://blog.gwup.net/2014/01/08/daruber-lachen-und- forget-homeopathy-and-scientabilitat /
As a test of whether funzt's no link. @ Bullet wanted to send you to the left, from which ersichtlichist split that the concept of Scientabilität is quite controversial. Psiram blog, or blog GWUP eg
I had earlier split times wanted only briefly, but found nothing, what a "controversy" is similar. And indeed, it would surprise split me even schwerstens. But I'm willing to learn. I am mainly split interested the starting point of criticism. Because "we take care of anything that contradicts the laws of physics