Saturday, August 2, 2014

Blog demolishes Text Articles with text-derived Reviews Conversations Translations Project demolish


PROJECT demolition wants to be a singular community. Singular strip because of its leaps here and now of a specific, although it feels the need to be open to anything that might happen in other places and contexts. Community headless because they form the set of those who share does not belong, because their work is desobra.
Blog demolishes Text Articles with text-derived Reviews Conversations Translations Project demolishes Editions Derritaxes front Derribadoiros Monographs Monographs front Audio Materials Workshops Workshops Schedule poréticas front
Put in an order is to say, maybe fix a calligraphic writing that accompanied me during a stay in Trasmiras. Go after a write analog to a digital, and give thanks to the machine, front the machines that enable this traffic. As far as the writing that it was able to be welcoming to animals, for we know not what idea / problem, thought missing.
So, if you were able to follow these rules could walk the rest of the day and the plain look for animals that no longer were in the village, as the village either. But the rest would be safe, and minimum speeds for common throughout that sentence: front Now, now what to do ...
Did you know by now surely what the context of the coming talks. But the matter is that those gravitated together with my body and had an idea, and therefore a problem, my daily life holiday. Where is that animals gone.
"The adversary and accomplice of writing, his Big Brother (or rather, their O` Brien), is the language, I mean, not only the language but the legacy of words, turns and works we call literary culture. "(Lyotard, front 104-105)
The lack
"We front wrote against the language, front but we do necessarily with her. Say what she already knows to say, this is not to write. We mean what she does not know what to say but, as we suppose, must be able to say "(L 105)
The imperceptíbel
Fantasy (L 108)
"For this reason I find it necessary to extend the line of reason in the line of writing. front The work of writing ( 105) is related to the work of love ( 101/7), but register footprint of the event initiation ( 105) in the language, and offer it that way the cast, but knowledge by checking the distribution of sensitivity that can and should be, by common ". (L 111)
But ... why bring the banquet here and why bring here before front Plato and Deleuze and Guattari the "Because they built a state apparatus that serves not only to destruction. So, the war machine no longer draws lines escape mutants, but a pure and cool line of abolition. "(D & G cit. Rubin, text 53)
"Before was spinning a web to another at random and, although he did believe something important, was more unhappy than any other, no less than you now, what you think is necessary to do anything but philosophize." (Banquet, 173a)

"But the most common is that a group or individual work himself as vanishing line; create rather front than follow it, be it a gun the living forges more than one who seizes it "(D & G cit. Rubin, front text 52)
"... But also is flexible in a way, as if rigid, would not be able to wrap everywhere, or go unnoticed in your first entry and exit of each soul [...]" front (Banquet, 196)
But in the invitations that encourage multiforme [to abolish the difference and repetition of the depths of intimate private-and public-common] to suspend artistic experience [aesthetic-sensitive to "abrote" to the surface] is also a call to order [the x (s) uízos determinants of some concern against live the life that stubborn (re) makes it out of proportion with the live-beyond the strength of determination (naturalization something that comes from inside / outside the law, which reflects . reflects the judgment)] a desire front to drive the indentidade, security, popularity, in the sense Deffenflichkeit, to "find an audience." (14 L)
And before the whole story of x (s) and determining uízos reflexionantes, all this war and that the statement front either-has launched front the hegemony of profit without resistance against the rules (no palaces) but throwing the passion (Spinoza).
The dialogue shows the idea of a man problem that will face his last day. But will its the last day of what is spoken there or fit another idea? Specifically, the eternity of the soul to the latter day is another matter. And Socrates refuses to leave. But progress.
We could say that the idea of the eternity of the soul related death than live doing jump into an abyss that resists to imagine that without front announcing a rule, therefore, to no avail. Then out of the line of profit, useless, without a net, but it will be up to think like light plastic, to resist the resistance. At the Banquet, not the idea of the eternity of the soul (that too), the idea of love. repeat, "but is also flexible d

No comments:

Post a Comment